Service

Wikipedia editing and updates.

When an existing article is inaccurate, unbalanced or out of date, the answer is not to quietly rewrite it. We pursue careful, well-evidenced changes the way Wikipedia intends - transparently and by consensus.

In brief
  • For existing articles that need correction, balance or updating.
  • Edit requests, not stealth edits. We propose changes on the talk page with sources.
  • Evidence-led. Every change is backed by a reliable, independent source.
  • Full COI disclosure on every account and request.

Editing an existing page is its own discipline

Changing a live Wikipedia article is, if anything, more sensitive than creating one. Established pages are watched by editors, and clumsy or undisclosed changes are quickly reverted - and can attract exactly the scrutiny a subject hoped to avoid. The correct route is to make the case for a change openly, with sources, and let the community act on it.

That is precisely how we work. Where you have a conflict of interest in a subject - which, as the subject or their representative, you do - the proper mechanism is a disclosed edit request on the article's talk page, setting out the proposed change and the reliable source that supports it.

What we can help with

  • Factual corrections - dates, titles, roles and other verifiable details that are simply wrong.
  • Outdated content - updating an article as a career, company or body of work develops.
  • Balance and tone - addressing material that is unbalanced or not written from a neutral point of view.
  • Poorly sourced claims - flagging or improving statements that lack reliable sourcing.

What we cannot promise

We cannot remove accurate, well-sourced information simply because it is unwelcome. Wikipedia is not a promotional platform, and attempting to scrub the verifiable record tends to backfire. What we can do is ensure that what is published is accurate, current, fairly weighted and properly cited.


Common Questions

Questions, answered plainly.

Q.Can you remove negative information from my Wikipedia page?

Only where it is inaccurate, unsourced, or violates Wikipedia's policies on biographies of living persons. We cannot and will not attempt to delete accurate, well-sourced material simply because it is unflattering - that is against the rules and rarely succeeds.

Q.Why not just edit the page directly?

Because you have a conflict of interest. Wikipedia's guidance is clear that people connected to a subject should propose changes through disclosed edit requests rather than editing the article themselves. It is also far more durable: consensus-backed changes stick.

Q.How are changes actually made?

We post a clear, sourced edit request on the article's talk page with full disclosure, and independent editors review and implement it if they agree. We track the request through to resolution.

Q.Can you fix an article that was flagged or has warning banners?

Often, yes - many maintenance banners point to fixable issues such as missing citations, tone, or notability concerns. We assess the flags, address what can legitimately be addressed, and advise honestly where an issue is structural.
Enquiries

Begin a confidential conversation.

If you believe your achievements meet the threshold for an encyclopedic entry - or you wish to review an existing one - we would be glad to assess it candidly and in confidence.