Our approach & editorial standards.

Built by experienced Wikipedia editors

WikiExec was founded to bring an unusual combination to a difficult task: deep, practical Wikipedia experience applied with the discretion that people and institutions of standing expect. Our editors have spent more than 15 years working within Wikipedia - researching subjects, assembling sources, drafting in the encyclopedia's house style and navigating the review processes that decide what stays.

That experience matters because Wikipedia is unforgiving of work that does not understand it. Knowing the difference between a source that establishes notability and one that merely looks impressive, or why a particular sentence will read as promotion to an experienced editor, is the difference between an article that endures and one that is deleted within days. It is judgement earned over years, not a template.

The standards we hold ourselves to

Every engagement is held to the same standards the encyclopedia itself applies. They are not marketing language; they are the criteria a volunteer reviewer will use, and the reason our work tends to survive.

• Notability first. We begin with an honest test against Wikipedia's notability guidelines, and we say so plainly when a subject does not yet meet them.
• Verifiability. Every significant claim is mapped to a reliable, independent source a reader can check.
• Neutral point of view. We write to describe, not to promote - the only register that holds up over time.
• Transparency. We disclose paid contributions on-wiki, as the Terms of Use require. No covert accounts, ever.

Why our approach is different

Much of the paid-editing market works against Wikipedia rather than with it - undisclosed accounts, promotional copy dressed as encyclopedic content, and guarantees no one can honestly make. These tactics are the most common reason commissioned articles are deleted, and when they are exposed they can do lasting reputational harm to the very person they were meant to help.

We take the opposite view. The only Wikipedia presence worth having is one that could withstand any editor's scrutiny, which is why we would rather decline a brief than compromise the standards that make an entry credible. Our entire value is in doing this the legitimate way.

How an engagement works

In practice that means a candid assessment first, careful research and sourcing second, neutral drafting and disclosed submission third, and - where wanted - stewardship of the live article over time. You can see the full range of services, or request a complimentary notability assessment to find out, honestly, where you stand.